Movies

I've caught "Isn't She Great" several times now (It seems to be eternally running on the movie channels).This was a monster flop when it came out, barely released, but it does a fine job of capturing the era.The main attraction of this film is the acting of the leads. Both Nathan Lane and Bette Midler can come off incredibly stagy on film, but their style works well with these characters. Jackie Suzanne was larger than life. They both manage to bring a true sense of sweetness to their roles.Particular note must be made of David Hyde Pierce as her editor. This actor fits very well in this era. Also, John Cleese is a hoot as the publisher. Wish there were more of him in the movie.Give this one a chance. A period piece from a currently unhip period.

How did I ever miss this one when it was at the theater? Found it in the Video rental and picked it because of the dozen well know actors from John Creasy to Nathan Lane, Amanda, Peets, Stockard Channing, Bev Midler, "Niles" from Fraiser, John LaRoquette...Some were minor parts, but all did an excellent job. We laughed and laughed. If you can listen to the word F*CK used in many funny lines, you will too!

True, the other user was right, this movie is a drag queens wet dream. But besides that, it is a sweet film was light, subtle humor.I guess you either like it or hate it, but how can you not like it? Its never mean spirited or vulgar, its enjoyable. Besides for "Jinxed" (and "The Thorn"-BAD!!!!), I never saw a movie by Bette that I didn't like, and this is no exception. Bette is charming, funny, and sweet. And after seeing this, I hope you think so too.10/10